Let E be any given equational theory not necessarily admitting a finite canonical system. One knows then, that ordered completion is adequate for proving valid (equational) E-theorems. This is so, since it generates a final system which is ground canonical, if the reduction ordering employed is a cso. The same fact also leads to a rather loose conclusion that narrowing techniques must suffice for E-unication, when combined with ordered completion. In this work, we found such a conclusion on a clear basis, by giving an inference system which also allows the narrowing to be basic. Our inference rules are expressed in a setting of constraints, allowing our initial equations to be constrained too. We will be assuming however, to be working only with equality, or ordering constraints. Our approach, though inspired by the earlier works of [KKR90], [NR92], uses a slightly different notion of constrained rewriting. This helps us arrive at the following conclusions: - If tau is any solution of the unicand s ?= t, then our basic narrowing under ordered completion generates a sigma more general than tau. - If the initial equations are without constraints, the superposition in our ordered paramodulation inferences is basic too. - The unicands can always be kept in normal form. - If (some of) the initial equations are constrained, our approach needs to resort to some propagation'in the sense of [KKR90] to remain complete; but this is needed only wrt the initial constraints. The ordered completion part of our approach may thus be viewed as extending the results of [NR92], to allow for intial constraints. The ground confluence of our 'final system' S, as well as the completeness of our narrowing, are proved by establishing that any S-step between any two ground terms s, t, can be replaced by an (innermost) S-chain between s, t with S-normal matches all along. References [KKR90] C. Kirchner, H. Kirchner, and M. Rusinowitch. Deduction with symbolic constraints. Revue d'Intelligence Articielle, 4(3):9-52, 1990. Special issue on automatic deduction. [NR92] R. Nieuwenhuis and A. Rubio. Basic superposition is complete. In proceedings 11th international conference on automated deduction, Albany (NY, USA), volume 617 of lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer-Verlag 1992.